Monday, October 26, 2015

Pundit Frank Bruni on Family

“What Family Really Means”
Frank Bruni
The New York Times
Oct. 24, 2015

In this week’s article, Frank Bruni discusses what makes a family a family.  He ties this into the recent gathering of Roman Catholic leaders called the Synod of Bishiops on the Family. This was a meeting of Roman Catholic Bishops in order to discuss the church’s views on divorce, remarriage, unmarried couples, and same sex couples. However, unlike many of Bruni’s other articles, the focus was not on the current event. As I was reading this, I felt as if this topic was a lot more personal to Bruni. He related his life to his view of what constitutes a family.


Bruni begins this article with an allusion to his friend Elli. Elli has never given birth and has never adopted, however she has many children. She helps college-age boys from Zimbabwe apply to colleges in the US and keeps in contact with them throughout their years. They gather at her house for holidays. They consider themselves family. By alluding to this specific example, Bruni defies traditional ideas of family. He specifically opens up the article with “My friend Elli has never given birth, never adopted never taken primary responsibility for an infant, a toddle or an adolescent.” After reading this, you may believe that there is no possibility for her to be considered a mother. However, Bruni then writes “But on the far side of 65, she finds herself playing the role of mother… By any definition of the word that matters, she and her kids are a family.”  This allusion was very effective in that Bruni personally knew Elli, so it appeals to ethos. It also opens up the article with many stereotypes of a family already defied.  

Monday, October 19, 2015

Pundit 2.2: Frank Bruni- An Admissions Surprise From the Ivy League

Frank Bruni
The New York Times
"An Admissions Surprise From the Ivy League"
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/18/opinion/sunday/an-admissions-surprise-from-the-ivy-league.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2Ffrank-bruni&action=click&contentCollection=opinion&region=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=collection&_r=0

This week, Frank Bruni discussed the new coalition of colleges that are trying to create an easier path for students from low-income families to apply to colleges. In order to accomplish this, they are planning to create an online platform for "one-stop shopping for information about financial aid, application requirements and more." Bruni then goes on to discuss how this online tool will actually benefit students of low-income families. He says that the coalition will have to really push and give the students information, because the online tool may be looked over. 

Bruni appeals to ethos because he acknowledges how his views compare to others. As he says, "Unlike many of this new coalition’s harshest critics, I trust that the schools involved really do want to diversify their student bodies, which don’t reflect American society." He mentions how the coalition has critics, but then he states that he disagrees with them. However, he does write that "like those critics, I wonder how the new application process will accomplish this and whether it would be more effective to adopt less complicated, confusing strategies." Bruni is not completely opposed to the coalitions critics. He mentions how he agrees and disagrees with them. Bruni also appeals to logos by using statistics of the students who receive grants and aid at different top tier schools. He says "In the Ivy League, the percentage ranged from 12 (Yale) to 21 (Columbia), according to the National Center for Education Statistics. While 31 percent of students at the University of California, Berkeley, received Pell grants, just 13 percent at the University of Virginia did." 

Monday, October 12, 2015

Pundit 2.1: Bruni

Frank Bruni
The New York Times
“Carly Fiorina’s Shameless Promotion”
Oct. 7, 2015
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/07/opinion/frank-bruni-carly-fiorinas-shameless-promotion.html

In this article, Frank Bruni writes about Carly Fiorina’s downfalls as a presidential candidate. First, he starts of with saying what he liked about Fiorina. He opens up his article by saying “Carly Fiorina gives one heck of a speech. That was my first impression, a positive one…” However, he then begins naming all of her downfalls. He talks about many of her payments are late. He also states that many of her former employees, when asked if they would work or her again, say that they would rather fight in Iraq than work for her again.


Bruni appeals to logos in this article. He states many facts and incidents about Carly Fiorina. Bruni also appeals to ethos because he doesn’t just bash all the bad things that Carly Fiorina has done. At first, he states the things that he likes about Fiorina. After, that he states what she has done wrong. This allows the article to not sound so biased. He states some facts for the opinion of the other side. This makes Bruni sound trustworthier.

Pundit 2.1: Frank Bruni on Carly Fiorina

Frank Bruni
The New York Times
“Carly Fiorina’s Shameless Promotion”
Oct. 7, 2015
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/07/opinion/frank-bruni-carly-fiorinas-shameless-promotion.html

In this article, Frank Bruni writes about Carly Fiorina’s downfalls as a presidential candidate. First, he starts of with saying what he liked about Fiorina. He opens up his article by saying “Carly Fiorina gives one heck of a speech. That was my first impression, a positive one…” However, he then begins naming all of her downfalls. He talks about many of her payments are late. He also states that many of her former employees, when asked if they would work or her again, say that they would rather fight in Iraq than work for her again.


Bruni appeals to logos in this article. He states many facts and incidents about Carly Fiorina. Bruni also appeals to ethos because he doesn’t just bash all the bad things that Carly Fiorina has done. At first, he states the things that he likes about Fiorina. After, that he states what she has done wrong. This allows the article to not sound so biased. He states some facts for the opinion of the other side. This makes Bruni sound trustworthier.

Monday, May 12, 2014

Fate

In Macbeth, whether you should interfere with fate is a huge theme in the book. When Macbeth gets his first prophecy from the witches about being king, he questions whether he should interfere with fate and kill Duncan or just let it happen. Lady Macbeth urges Macbeth to just go ahead and interfere with fate and take matters into his own hands. However, we see this is a huge mistake. One murder turns into another, and another, and another. Macbeth and Lady Macbeth can not stop murdering people once they kill Duncan. They kill one person and then find another that they have to kill. The murder drives both of them crazy and eventually kills them.

This story shows how you should just let your fate happen and not try to take matters into you own hands. If Macbeth would have just let his fate happen, he would have never killed all of those people and he would not have been killed. Macbeth thought that the deal would be done after they killed Duncan, but it ended up that he had to continue to kill more and more people. It was an endless trail.


Reading and Working Times
5-6 Portfolio: 1 hour
5-8 Portfolio: 1 hour

Monday, May 5, 2014

Reading and Working Times 5/5

4/30 Portfolio Project - Transformation  30 mins
5/1 Portfolio Project - Transformation Analysis 20 mins
5/2 Portfolio Project - Transformation Analysis 20 mins
5/4 Portfolio Project - Writing 60 mins

Macbeth Quote

Macbeth kills Duncan, but realizes what he has gotten into after and has to kill more people. He says, "Things bad begun make strong themselves ill" (95). This means that when you do bad things, doing other bad things make them worse. Macbeth realizes this when he kills Duncan, but then he realizes that he has to Banquo also. Before all of the killing started he though all he had to do was kill Duncan to be king, but then he has to kill Banquo. After he kills Banquo, he has to try and kill Banquo's children. He realizes that the cycle of killing will never end if he keeps on going.

Along with the thought of the endless cycle of murder, Macbeth also says, "I am in blood. Stepped in so far that, should I wade no more," (109). This means that Macbeth has already killed so many people, but if he stops killing people he will not succeed, but in order to succeed he would have to kill many more people. He realizes that there is no going back, and he does not know what to do. From both of these quotes, Macbeth is realizing that trying to fix a bad thing with another bad thing only makes the situation worse.